[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Nov 18 10:26:47 CET 2016
On 18/11/2016 01:34, Jim Reid wrote: > >> On 17 Nov 2016, at 10:18, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What about the following, roughly speaking: >> >> - Anybody can be a candidate, with the possible exception of RIPE NCC >> Staff and Board. Otherwise, they need to leave their positions at the >> RIPE NCC, if they get selected as the RIPE Chair at the end of the >> process to avoid conflict of interest or perception of it. >> >> - WG Chairs Collective at the time evaluates all candidates and comes >> up with a list of eligible candidates. >> >> - RIPE Community runs an election among these eligible candidates >> (Like the ones we run for NRO NC reps or RIPE PC...). >> >> - Vice-Chair gets appointed by the elected-RIPE Chair. > > Changing election and elected to selection and selected, would make this work for me.* > > If we can converge on this outline, we can then move on to a discussion about how the RIPE community appoints the Chair. One of those mechanisms might be an election. > > The form of words above pre-judges the outcome of that discussion: ie all possibilities which are not an election are excluded and not to be considered. > > > *I would prefer the evaluation to be done by a broader group than just the WG Chair Collective: the NCC Board and/or Management should probably have a say too. That then starts to look like a nomcom. Hmmm. I also think it would be better to use the same process (whatever that process may be) to appoint the Chair and Vice Chair. Assuming we have a Vice Chair. While I quite like the shape of Filiz's suggestions I would be very careful of the level of input given to the NCC Management and/or Board. While the RIPE Chair has to work very closely with the NCC, this is a Community decision and must be clearly seen as same. If we do go for a NomCom I'd be inclined to suggest the WG Chairs, the RIPE PC and possibly the community selected NRO members. I would very much agree with the conflict of interest provisions extending to RIPE PC and WG Chairs. Albeit it is easier for them to step down than for a permanent NCC staff member! Of course if a candidate comes from one of the groups who are making up a NomCom, then they should, at the very least, recluse themselves from that whole process. Thanks, Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]