[atlas] Proposal: Add support for STARTTLS measurements [STARTTLS]
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] V3 Probe: USB Flash Drive Filesystem Corrupted
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] ripe-atlas Digest, Vol 137, Issue 8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ripe.net at toppas.net
ripe.net at toppas.net
Mon Jan 9 21:13:27 CET 2023
Hi Robert, i really appreciate the introduction of STARTTLS measurements! But if you do so, i strongly recommend to also introduce four new System Tags: IPv4 FCrDNS working IPv4 FCrDNS not working IPv6 FCrDNS working IPv6 FCrDNS not working A lot of mailservers will block or cancel inbound connections, if the sending server has no Forward-confirmed reverse DNS record. Some mailservers do this immediately, others do it at a later communication stage. So, when someone would create a new STARTTLS measurement, it would be a huge help to be able to only choose probes, which have FCrDNS. It shouldn't matter, if it's a simple or obfuscated DNS record. Please also take into consideration, to make FCrDNS mandatory for (new) anchors. BR, Simon On 14.12.22 15:04, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > Dear RIPE Atlas users, > > We recently published a RIPE Labs article containing a few proposals: https://labs.ripe.net/author/kistel/five-proposals-for-a-better-ripe-atlas/. We'd like to encourage you to express your comments about this proposal (if you'd like to share them) here. > > Regards, > Robert Kisteleki > For the RIPE Atlas team > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20230109/9438e030/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] V3 Probe: USB Flash Drive Filesystem Corrupted
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] ripe-atlas Digest, Vol 137, Issue 8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]