[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Some Software Probes do not send any results
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Eagles
paul at pauleagles.com
Fri Feb 14 10:56:57 CET 2020
If it's interesting to the community I could fire up a software probe at my house where I've also got a v4 probe. That way it would be a fairly direct comparison, even down to the hardware & software probe being in the same switch. ~P. -----Original Message----- From: ripe-atlas <ripe-atlas-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Robert Kisteleki Sent: 14 February 2020 09:38 To: Romain Fontugne <romain at iij.ad.jp> Cc: ripe-atlas at ripe.net Subject: Re: [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs Linux on nowadays. Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates (same AS, same prefix, approximately same location): https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/1000030/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/28270/ (v3) or: https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/1000041/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/54558/ (v4) Cheers, Robert On 2020-02-14 02:42, Romain Fontugne wrote: > my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old > v1 seems a msec slower. All are very stable > > Romain > > > On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 1000004, and >> 1000006 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same >> vrrp exit etc. >> >> randy >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Some Software Probes do not send any results
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]