[atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Feb 20 09:36:05 CET 2019
Hi, On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:52:28AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, scg at gibbard.org wrote: > > ASN coverage is just 5.6%. That really doesn't give a complete global > view for stats. Rather than return money to LIRs every year in their > bill, why not state that any LIR running an active probe within their ASN > will get a 50Euro credit on their bill? That alone would increase ASN > footprint coverage quickly within RIPE. I like that suggestion :-) (Not sure how that will pan out if we reach 50% of all LIRs, but to get from 5% to 20%, it might definitely be an idea) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20190220/a7e9de40/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]