[atlas] contacing probe owner.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] contacing probe owner.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probes fluctuation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
carsten at schiefner.de
Sat Apr 20 14:16:44 CEST 2019
Hi Geert Jan - On 20.04.2019 13:49, Geert Jan de Groot wrote: >> Quite the opposite IMHO, understanding that the anticipated means of >> communication will be email and that the email address of a probe's host >> will be generic, eg. <ripe-atlas-probe-[number]@atlas.ripe.net>, >> redirecting all incoming emails to a final address. The redirection >> would be configured via the portal then. > > Using an address as described above would allow enumeration attacks. true. OTOH & as I wrote: I don't really care. > If it would use a hash instead it would be safer. > > The hash for probe XXX would be obtainable via the portal, where you > would need to look up probe's details anyway. Do I? Always? I have attempted to deploy KISS here - but anyhow: I'd obviously also be fine with a more advanced (definition thereof) solution. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] contacing probe owner.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Probes fluctuation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]