[atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Andrewartha
jandrewartha at ccgs.wa.edu.au
Tue Jun 12 05:13:24 CEST 2018
On 12/06/18 10:47, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:44 AM James Andrewartha > <jandrewartha at ccgs.wa.edu.au> wrote: >>> Many would argue that the setup is already broken in many ways and >>> that this is just one bit of breakage that you happened to notice. >> >> So what is your recommendation for IPv6 multi-homing without BGP? > > For the home, homenet protocols. RFC7368? > For small enterprises, draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras, which is > about to become an RFC. > For larger enterprises, draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming And what's the implementation support for these protocols like? Hmm, let's read draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming: > How a host should make good decisions about source address selection > in a multihomed site is not a solved problem. We do not attempt to > solve this problem in this document. Followed by a discussion on possible ways it might work if the routers can react to network changes by sending new RAs, which I love would to know if there are any implementations that can do this. -- James Andrewartha Network & Projects Engineer Christ Church Grammar School Claremont, Western Australia Ph. (08) 9442 1757 Mob. 0424 160 877
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]