[atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Andrewartha
jandrewartha at ccgs.wa.edu.au
Tue Jun 12 04:43:58 CEST 2018
On 12/06/18 10:41, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:42 AM Roman Mamedov <rm at romanrm.net> wrote: > I fully expect that you didn't account for such a setup in the controller >> infrastructure or possibly various "local IP is valid" checks and whatnot, but >> why this used to work fine before? Has there been any change on your side in >> April that would break this kind of setup? > > Many would argue that the setup is already broken in many ways and > that this is just one bit of breakage that you happened to notice. So what is your recommendation for IPv6 multi-homing without BGP? -- James Andrewartha Network & Projects Engineer Christ Church Grammar School Claremont, Western Australia Ph. (08) 9442 1757 Mob. 0424 160 877
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Running a probe behind a NAT66
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]