[atlas] Anchors as target hosts for SLA
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Anchors as target hosts for SLA
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Anchors as target hosts for SLA
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio Prado
thinkofit at gmail.com
Tue Jun 6 19:46:42 CEST 2017
On 6/6/17 7:03 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Too simple. What if that anchor is down, or the anchor host network has > a network bottleneck towards the transit provider you are using? well, I selected two anchors placed in two different NAPs where all ISPs in my scenario are present. so, not a big concern if one anchor is down. the other issue about possible bottlenecks is not applicable in that context. > So you need something that averages over multiple anchors - we used to > do that via TTM ("if our TTM hosts can reach more than 80% of all other > TTM hosts, we declare the Internet to be in good working condition" - note > the "80%", because something is always down somewhere) but haven't come > around to define & implement something based on ATLAS yet. I like the idea and it should definitely be the way to go. thank you -- antonio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 163 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20170606/eeea92d6/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Anchors as target hosts for SLA
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Anchors as target hosts for SLA
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]