[atlas] probe congestion?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe congestion?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Number of probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed May 11 14:06:12 CEST 2016
One-offs are not intended to be used like this. The emphasis with them is to schedule as quickly as possible *no matter what*. This is for quick look-see work. Not for repeated measurements on the same set of probes. If you want to schedule that much from an indentical set of probes, do not use one-offs. Daniel On 11.05.16 13:57 , Paul Vlaar wrote: > Same thing here, I just did another test. Ran 7 UDMs in parallel for SOA > ripe.net @ manus.authdns.ripe.net, the result of one of those: > > https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/3793292/#!probes > > Compared to running another one, but on its own w/o scheduling others in > the same run: > > https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/3793293/#!probes > > I'd call this a bug, or at least something to somehow work around, but > not sure how, yet. > > ~paul > >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe congestion?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Number of probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]