[atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nico CARTRON
nicolas at ncartron.org
Fri Dec 11 10:18:50 CET 2015
Hi Randy, On 9 December 2015 at 20:33:46, Randy Bush (randy at psg.com) wrote: > Fully agreed, but I still don’t see why they are downplaying the event > like this. as shumon tweeted, this was the intersection of what the root ops were willing to say. given that, i am surprised they said anything at all. i guess they had to say something, and this was about as little that could be said to be 'something'; impressively content free. an interesting measurement experiment (not atlas) might be to see the smallest number of PR departments needed to remove all useful content from a post-mortem. :) well, that was the point I was trying to make: when you do a PR, people usually expect to learn something. In that case, I got the feeling that I learnt absolutely nothing, while the PR was kind of finger-pointing to solutions such as Atlas, telling that they do not necessarily represent real life. While this is true (as pointed out by Daniel), I found it quite awkward… Cheers, -- Nico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20151211/8665b5f9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]