[atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
philip.homburg at ripe.net
Tue Dec 8 17:15:14 CET 2015
On 2015/12/08 17:08 , Daniel Karrenberg wrote: >> I wonder if in the case of local DNSSEC validating resolvers behind >> DNSSEC-unware resolvers in CPEs, this model is still valid. > > At the risk of turning this into another DNS discussion list: Why are > you wondering exactly? DNSSEC validating resolvers do cache, don't they? To give an example, the ssh client I use is linked with getdns. Getdns will try to fetch RRSIG records, etc. from the local resolver. If that fails, getdns will become a full recursive resolver. When ssh starts, the cache of getdns will be empty. And after DNS resolution whatever is cached will not be used anymore.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]