[atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Dec 8 16:54:29 CET 2015
On 8.12.15 16:45 , Nico CARTRON wrote: > > Fully agreed, but I still don’t see why they are downplaying the event > like this. I would call it "putting into perspective". The DNS kept working. > > Tools such as DNSMON are useful, and of course need to be taken with a > grain of salt and not blindly believed “as it”. Again: dnsmon is *not* a tool to measure DNS service. You know that, I know that and most people on this list know that. Most of the people reading a public statement probably *do not* know that. So it needs to be pointed out. Otherwise we will get headlines of doom for no good reason. > > A lot of users/eyeballs have noticed problems, so pretending this did > not happen is not really… constructive. Provide data please! > (OK, they did not pretend this did not happen, but downplaying is kind > of the same to me). See above. Daniel one of "them"
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] DNSmon "not indicative of what happens to normal traffic" claims the root ops
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]