[atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
robachevsky at isoc.org
Mon Sep 16 12:51:43 CEST 2013
Tapio Sokura wrote on 9/15/13 5:08 AM: > >> what useful is actually being measured? unless it's a name and shame >> game. and then you will want to know if things 'improve' over time, >> which means it is not a one-shot. > > Name and shame can work in some cases. It can be a "name and shame" with a positive spin - an "anti-spoofing" movement I mentioned before. A network can get and stay on a list if (until) they pass a spoofer or atlas test. I think it can help raise awareness and attention to this issue, at least. Andrei
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]