[atlas] Strong doubts about the option "DNS recursion"
Jérôme Benoit jerome.benoit at grenouille.com
Sat Oct 26 06:20:23 CEST 2013
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:59:12 +0200 in <20131025115912.GA2543 at nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote: > > > Another thing is that just silently setting the flag is not optimal, > > It is not "not optimal", it is _wrong_. > > > maybe the measurement should have been rejected instead. > > And the documentation fixed! Give us the source code also, the software will be also fixed in less than one hour. Does RIPE plan to release source code or not ? How can a user (its working on whatever you what) trust a measurement system that just do not give the basic level of transparency that a measurement system *need* to be trusted ? The availability of the source code to every single user ! the code can be modified or not, I just do not care about license issue, what I care about is the measurement system transparency, the rest is poetry for brainless persons). -- Jérôme Benoit aka fraggle OpenPGP Key ID : 9FE9161D Key fingerprint : 9CA4 0249 AF57 A35B 34B3 AC15 FAA0 CB50 9FE9 161D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20131026/600b5aa4/attachment.sig>