[atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Santcroos
mark at santcroos.net
Wed Jun 20 11:43:52 CEST 2012
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote: > I have to admit that we never investigated the extent of the jitter problem. Maybe the RIPE NCC could investigate the idea of creating a worldwide network of high accuracy measurement nodes. Time stamping could happen at (network) hardware level (or alternatively at kernel level) and the time source could be GPS. Oh wait :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] probe resolution, overhead, or ...?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]