From daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net Mon Sep 5 10:31:53 2011 From: daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net (Daniel Karrenberg) Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:31:53 +0200 Subject: [atlas] New Face(s) in the Measurements and Tools Area Message-ID: <20110905083153.GC429@reifripenet.local> Gentlepeople, I am very happy to announce that we have a new community builder for measuremnts and tools: Vesna Manjolovic. Many of you will know Vesna already as a trainer and through her very enthousiastic work on our IPv6 promotion and IPv6 related measurements. Vesna has been with the RIPE NCC for more than 10 years; it gives me great pleasure to promote her to a position that makes optimal use of her capabilities and ambitions. Vesna's first priorities will be to establish relationships with current and potential sponsors of RIPE Atlas and to help develop a plan for the evoloution of RIPE TTM. RIPE Atlas sponsors and RIPE TTM customers will hear from her soon. The decision to hire internally not only affirms that initiative and effort are rewarded at the RIPE NCC; it also provides the budgetary room to engage another person to help with the community building for measurements: Ann Barcomb will therefore join Vesna in October. >From that time both Vesna and Ann will start to work on additional goals such as building a strong community around RIPEstat. Please join me in welcoming Vesna and help her to achieve her goals, which are also our common goals. Daniel From ck at minxs.net Tue Sep 6 13:03:20 2011 From: ck at minxs.net (Christian Kaufmann) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:03:20 +0200 Subject: [atlas] [mat-wg] New Face(s) in the Measurements and Tools Area In-Reply-To: <20110905083153.GC429@reifripenet.local> References: <20110905083153.GC429@reifripenet.local> Message-ID: Hi Vesna, The MAT WG chairs are very happy to see that the RIPE NCC is putting more resources into building a community around its measurements and tools efforts, but also to ensure that the project goes more into the direction of self funding. All the best for your new job, and let us know if we can be of service. ck On behalf of the MAT WG Chairs. On Sep 5, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > Gentlepeople, > > I am very happy to announce that we have a new community builder for > measuremnts and tools: Vesna Manjolovic. Many of you will know Vesna > already as a trainer and through her very enthousiastic work on our > IPv6 promotion and IPv6 related measurements. Vesna has been with the > RIPE NCC for more than 10 years; it gives me great pleasure to promote > her to a position that makes optimal use of her capabilities and ambitions. > > Vesna's first priorities will be to establish relationships with current > and potential sponsors of RIPE Atlas and to help develop a plan for the > evoloution of RIPE TTM. RIPE Atlas sponsors and RIPE TTM customers will > hear from her soon. > > The decision to hire internally not only affirms that initiative and > effort are rewarded at the RIPE NCC; it also provides the budgetary room > to engage another person to help with the community building for > measurements: Ann Barcomb will therefore join Vesna in October. >> From that time both Vesna and Ann will start to work on additional > goals such as building a strong community around RIPEstat. > > Please join me in welcoming Vesna and help her to achieve her goals, > which are also our common goals. > > Daniel > From BECHA at ripe.net Tue Sep 6 18:18:42 2011 From: BECHA at ripe.net (Vesna Manojlovic) Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:18:42 +0200 Subject: [atlas] [mat-wg] New Face(s) in the Measurements and Tools Area In-Reply-To: References: <20110905083153.GC429@reifripenet.local> Message-ID: <4E6647E2.6080100@ripe.net> Dear colleagues, Daniel - thank you for the introduction, Christian - thank you for the warm welcome. As Daniel explained, I will be initially focusing on Atlas & TTM services. In addition to more structured feedback gathering that we are performing, I am also interested in hearing your experiences. Please don't hesitate to approach me, either in email, or on $favorite_social_media, or in person - I'm currently on the South-Eastern-Europe Regional Meeting in Dubrovnik. Regards, Vesna Manojlovic On 9/6/11 1:03 PM, Christian Kaufmann wrote: > Hi Vesna, > > The MAT WG chairs are very happy to see that the RIPE NCC is putting > more resources into building a community around its measurements and > tools efforts, but also to ensure that the project goes more into the direction of self funding. > > All the best for your new job, > and let us know if we can be of service. > > ck > > On behalf of the MAT WG Chairs. > > > > On Sep 5, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > >> Gentlepeople, >> >> I am very happy to announce that we have a new community builder for >> measuremnts and tools: Vesna Manjolovic. Many of you will know Vesna >> already as a trainer and through her very enthousiastic work on our >> IPv6 promotion and IPv6 related measurements. Vesna has been with the >> RIPE NCC for more than 10 years; it gives me great pleasure to promote >> her to a position that makes optimal use of her capabilities and ambitions. >> >> Vesna's first priorities will be to establish relationships with current >> and potential sponsors of RIPE Atlas and to help develop a plan for the >> evoloution of RIPE TTM. RIPE Atlas sponsors and RIPE TTM customers will >> hear from her soon. >> >> The decision to hire internally not only affirms that initiative and >> effort are rewarded at the RIPE NCC; it also provides the budgetary room >> to engage another person to help with the community building for >> measurements: Ann Barcomb will therefore join Vesna in October. >>> From that time both Vesna and Ann will start to work on additional >> goals such as building a strong community around RIPEstat. >> >> Please join me in welcoming Vesna and help her to achieve her goals, >> which are also our common goals. >> >> Daniel >> > > > From robert at robert.id.au Wed Sep 7 04:35:42 2011 From: robert at robert.id.au (Robert) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:35:42 +1000 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online Message-ID: What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes offline or online? I'd like this is at will alert me to any network issue as soon as it happens allowing for that issue to be investigated and rectified. This means that the alert could serve a dual purpose: . Increased network uptime . Greater availability of the RIPE Atlas Probe (and thus increased data gathering). Anyway, this is something that I'd like to see - email alerts at a minimum. Robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rbarnes at bbn.com Wed Sep 7 05:27:44 2011 From: rbarnes at bbn.com (Richard L. Barnes) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:27:44 -0400 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <201109070300.p8730Yit023264@dfw-mailin1.raytheon.com> References: <201109070300.p8730Yit023264@dfw-mailin1.raytheon.com> Message-ID: <1D6B0D37-B5E8-40F9-B44C-D5D9D6174A93@bbn.com> This might not actually be desirable until the probes stop crashing so often :) It might be more useful to have alarms that trigger on things like sudden or sustained increases in latency or loss, configurable by the probe host. --Richard On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Robert wrote: > What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes offline or online? > > I?d like this is at will alert me to any network issue as soon as it happens allowing for that issue to be investigated and rectified. > > This means that the alert could serve a dual purpose: > > ? Increased network uptime > ? Greater availability of the RIPE Atlas Probe (and thus increased data gathering). > > Anyway, this is something that I?d like to see ? email alerts at a minimum. > > > Robert > From 58d2b8fb-9c68-41ba-8786-856d17decf29 at robert.id.au Wed Sep 7 05:53:10 2011 From: 58d2b8fb-9c68-41ba-8786-856d17decf29 at robert.id.au (Robert) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:53:10 +1000 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online Message-ID: What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes offline or online? I'd like this is at will alert me to any network issue as soon as it happens allowing for that issue to be investigated and rectified. This means that the alert could serve a dual purpose: . Increased network uptime . Greater availability of the RIPE Atlas Probe (and thus increased data gathering). Anyway, this is something that I'd like to see - email alerts at a minimum. Robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From listclient at sokolov.eu.org Wed Sep 7 08:43:42 2011 From: listclient at sokolov.eu.org (Daniel AJ Sokolov) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:43:42 -0300 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online Message-ID: <4E67129E.40505@sokolov.eu.org> On 07.09.2011 00:53 wrote Robert: > What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe > goes offline or online? I generally like the idea. There should be a threshold though - for example the e-mail could be triggered once the probe is offline for 5 minutes. BR Daniel AJ From bwijnen at ripe.net Wed Sep 7 09:15:00 2011 From: bwijnen at ripe.net (Bert Wijnen) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:15:00 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online Message-ID: <4E6719F4.1040001@ripe.net> On 9/7/11 4:35 AM, Robert wrote: > What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes offline or online? > > I?d like this is at will alert me to any network issue as soon as it happens allowing for that issue to be investigated and rectified. > > This means that the alert could serve a dual purpose: > > ?Increased network uptime > > ?Greater availability of the RIPE Atlas Probe (and thus increased data gathering). > > Anyway, this is something that I?d like to see ? email alerts at a minimum. > Email alerts for sure. And pretty quick after the probe is detected to be offline. SMS might be nice, but I certainly would like to have a way to turn it off at times. Bert > Robert > From henk at uijterwaal.nl Wed Sep 7 09:36:22 2011 From: henk at uijterwaal.nl (Henk Uijterwaal) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <4E6719F4.1040001@ripe.net> References: <4E6719F4.1040001@ripe.net> Message-ID: <4E671EF6.70805@uijterwaal.nl> On 07/09/2011 09:15, Bert Wijnen wrote: > On 9/7/11 4:35 AM, Robert wrote: >> What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes >> offline or online? First define offline. I like to be warned when there is a problem that is somehow under my control and I can actually do something about this, but not when the problem is outside my area of control. In case of a probe, that means that I want to be warned when the probe is switched off or connectivity on the path probe - adsl line - border router is lost. In those cases, I can do something to restore power or yell at my ISP. I don't want to be warned by SMS/Email/... if there is a problem between my ISP and data collection system is lost, as there is little I can do about that. > Email alerts for sure. And pretty quick after the probe is detected to be offline. > SMS might be nice, but I certainly would like to have a way to turn it off at > times. Ages ago, we introduced something like this for TTM and found that very few operators have the resources to follow up on SMS or email alerts outside their normal escalation paths. An interface to a NMS was mentioned as a nice feature, but nobody could come up with a spec. SNMP was mentioned, but again no spec to program against. Henk -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl http://www.uijterwaal.nl Phone: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day. (John Glanfield, on an engineering project) From rm at romanrm.ru Wed Sep 7 09:43:36 2011 From: rm at romanrm.ru (Roman Mamedov) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:43:36 +0600 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online Message-ID: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:35:42 +1000 "Robert" wrote: > What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes > offline or online? Wasn't something like this implemented just recently? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert Kisteleki To: ripe-atlas at ripe.net Subject: [atlas]Atlas current news Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:46:26 +0200 Sender: ripe-atlas-admin at ripe.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 Organization: RIPE NCC Dear Atlas users, We've added two new features to RIPE Atlas recently: 1. Automatic notification about down probes: if your probe has been down for some time, you'll get a one-time automatic notification. This happens after five consecutive days of downtime. 2. Static network configuration: after the testing round with volunteers, we decided to make this feature publicly available, thus released the 4.030 firmware version. You can read more about this feature at https://atlas.ripe.net/doc/static-config Regards, Robert Kisteleki, for the RIPE Atlas Team -- With respect, Roman -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dk at openit.de Wed Sep 7 09:29:53 2011 From: dk at openit.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Dennis_K=F6gel?=) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:29:53 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <20110907041309.AD433100047@mx.openit.de> References: <20110907041309.AD433100047@mx.openit.de> Message-ID: <89AF8C5E-52C3-4C66-9B1B-3958C40D8F78@openit.de> Am 07.09.2011 um 05:53 schrieb Robert: > What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes offline or online? Doing this monitoring-style is not a job for the NCC, IMHO, as this certainly involves way more work that one might think at first. This is a case for your local monitoring solution, which does that job much better. That being said, it might make sense to e-mail hosts if a probe has been down for a *long* time (something like "one e-mail per week of downtime"), just to catch dead hosts and unnoticed configuration fails. - D. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2079 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bwijnen at ripe.net Wed Sep 7 09:57:21 2011 From: bwijnen at ripe.net (Bert Wijnen) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:57:21 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> References: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> Message-ID: <4E6723E1.9090108@ripe.net> On 9/7/11 9:43 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > We've added two new features to RIPE Atlas recently: > > 1. Automatic notification about down probes: if your probe has been down for > some time, you'll get a one-time automatic notification. This happens after > five consecutive days of downtime. Right, and I personally would prefer that to be much sooner. Say after a couple of hours or so. Maybe it would be nice to make it configurable by the host. Bert From daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net Wed Sep 7 10:08:46 2011 From: daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net (Daniel Karrenberg) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:08:46 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <4E6723E1.9090108@ripe.net> References: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> <4E6723E1.9090108@ripe.net> Message-ID: <20110907080846.GJ429@reifripenet.local> On 07.09 09:57, Bert Wijnen wrote: > On 9/7/11 9:43 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > >We've added two new features to RIPE Atlas recently: > > > >1. Automatic notification about down probes: if your probe has been down > >for > >some time, you'll get a one-time automatic notification. This happens after > >five consecutive days of downtime. > > Right, and I personally would prefer that to be much sooner. > Say after a couple of hours or so. Maybe it would be nice > to make it configurable by the host. Indeed. There are two things here: 1) We want to re-activate probes that are down due to local problems, e.g. problems that the host can do something about. This is in the interest of the whole community because it helps to keep a large measurement network up and operating. For this purose we are already sending out e-mails after a couple of days of downtime. This is not going to change and we are considering more 'agressive' poking if the e-mails do not bring the probe back up. 2) Providing a service to the hosts that warns them of downtime etc. This should be configurable of course in terms of who gets alerted and how sensitive the trigger for an alert is; the default shold be "off". I have the feeling that this is also someting we may want to address as part of a more general alerting mechanism. As a host I might be interested in monitoring a totally different target, my family server located at a hoster, and do it not only from my own probe. That is called user defined measurements and an alerting system based on that will cover the case we are discussing now, because one will be able to monitor the first upstream from one's own probe. Right? Daniel From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Wed Sep 7 10:29:04 2011 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:29:04 +0000 Subject: [atlas] New Face(s) in the Measurements and Tools Area In-Reply-To: <20110905083153.GC429@reifripenet.local> References: <20110905083153.GC429@reifripenet.local> Message-ID: <4E672B50.6000108@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Hi Vesna! Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Gentlepeople, [...] > Please join me in welcoming Vesna It is a pleasure to do that [ send("e-embrace"."new-hat") ? :-) ] > and help her to achieve her goals, which are also our common goals. Indeed. I am looking forward to have a chat during, or maybe even before, RIPE63 in Vienna! > Daniel Best regards, Wilfried. From fabian at ieee.org Wed Sep 7 10:34:48 2011 From: fabian at ieee.org (Fabian Schneider) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:34:48 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <20110907080846.GJ429@reifripenet.local> References: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> <4E6723E1.9090108@ripe.net> <20110907080846.GJ429@reifripenet.local> Message-ID: <839201A7-CEEC-42FE-A424-049611A65B0A@ieee.org> Hi, personally i would really like such a feature. And from the responses so far i think the mechanism should account for the different mindset of people hosting a probe. I agree with Daniel that the default should be off and the sensitivity should be configurable (e.g. alert after X time offline): > 2) Providing a service to the hosts that warns them of downtime etc. This should be configurable of course in terms of who gets alerted and how sensitive the trigger for an alert is; the default shold be "off". Maybe i can extend a bit on this proposal. E.g. with the possibility to specify an alternate email address (other than for the registration) these alert mails could automatically be filtered. Personally i would prefer a mechanism that alerts me as soon as connectivity is lost for more than X minutes, with 1 < X < 10. In case i would get to many of these notifications, i would just go to the webpage and turnoff the notifications. Another option that just came to my mind is to send an activity report every month or so. This could then include a fraction of time the probe was up and/or connectivity was present. Maybe with a link to the status webpage. So that people are reminded of the existence of the probe once in a while. (Of course this should again be an opt-in mechanism. I would certainly subscribe.) best Fabian From robert at ripe.net Wed Sep 7 11:11:59 2011 From: robert at ripe.net (Robert Kisteleki) Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:11:59 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <839201A7-CEEC-42FE-A424-049611A65B0A@ieee.org> References: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> <4E6723E1.9090108@ripe.net> <20110907080846.GJ429@reifripenet.local> <839201A7-CEEC-42FE-A424-049611A65B0A@ieee.org> Message-ID: <4E67355F.8040006@ripe.net> Hello, > Maybe i can extend a bit on this proposal. E.g. with the possibility to > specify an alternate email address (other than for the registration) > these alert mails could automatically be filtered. > > Personally i would prefer a mechanism that alerts me as soon as > connectivity is lost for more than X minutes, with 1 < X < 10. In case i > would get to many of these notifications, i would just go to the webpage > and turnoff the notifications. This is doable and there seems to be demand for it, so we'll make it happen. Currently we're working on something bigger (user defined measurements), but we'll remember your words :-) > Another option that just came to my mind is to send an activity report > every month or so. This could then include a fraction of time the probe > was up and/or connectivity was present. Maybe with a link to the status > webpage. So that people are reminded of the existence of the probe once > in a while. (Of course this should again be an opt-in mechanism. I would > certainly subscribe.) Virtually all the information you mention is available on the probe status page already, but indeed we could introduce a mechanism to send reports to the host. Let us know if you'd like such a feature. Regards, Robert > best Fabian From simone at nulchis.it Wed Sep 7 20:50:32 2011 From: simone at nulchis.it (Simone Nulchis) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:50:32 +0200 Subject: [atlas] R: Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online In-Reply-To: <20110907030047.8E70E166C2D@l-smtpin-01.lunet.it> References: <20110907030047.8E70E166C2D@l-smtpin-01.lunet.it> Message-ID: <002901cc6d8f$0bcf55f0$236e01d0$@it> Hi all, >What do other participants think about having email alerts when a probe goes offline or online? I think it could be a nice feature; in my opinion it should be implemented in "my probe" section of Ripe ATLAS under "Probe's Settings" a specific section that permits to enable such feature and customize the threshold and contact addresses. Simone Nulchis Lucense SCpA From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Thu Sep 8 15:18:09 2011 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:18:09 +0000 Subject: [atlas] Push-vs-Pull [was: Email or SMS alert when probe goes offline/online] In-Reply-To: <4E67355F.8040006@ripe.net> References: <20110907134336.75445cb1@natsu> <4E6723E1.9090108@ripe.net> <20110907080846.GJ429@reifripenet.local> <839201A7-CEEC-42FE-A424-049611A65B0A@ieee.org> <4E67355F.8040006@ripe.net> Message-ID: <4E68C091.6010308@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Robert Kisteleki wrote: > Hello, [...] >>Another option that just came to my mind is to send an activity report >>every month or so. This could then include a fraction of time the probe >>was up and/or connectivity was present. Maybe with a link to the status >>webpage. So that people are reminded of the existence of the probe once >>in a while. (Of course this should again be an opt-in mechanism. I would >>certainly subscribe.) > > > Virtually all the information you mention is available on the probe status > page already, Correct. Also the possibility to download the "raw data" is great, many thanks for that! > but indeed we could introduce a mechanism to send reports to > the host. Let us know if you'd like such a feature. This actually led me to changing the subject line. Right now consumption of the data and results on the probe owners' ends is based on "pull". Which is a Good Thing [TM] in itself. However, without doing extensive and error-prone scripting, it is difficult to automate and to feed into exisiting local machinery. So - here is a plee for coming up with some framework that allows me to have (selected .or. all) data *pushed* to a target on my end. This could be as simple as sending that stuff to a mailbox I vreate for that purpose and which I can register with the data repoitory hub. Of course, some safeguards apply to prevent from people "data-bombing" innocent recipients :-) This would also support sharing the data for my probe(s) with other parties for comparison - at least as long as there isn't a more fine-grained access permission system in place at the hub than [private .xor. fully-public]. Any other distribution technology that may be appropriate is fine, of course. I would immediately use that service to collect and archive "my data" on a regular basis! > Regards, > Robert > > >>best Fabian Thanks, Wilfried. From robert at ripe.net Mon Sep 12 10:01:22 2011 From: robert at ripe.net (Robert Kisteleki) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:01:22 +0200 Subject: [atlas] Atlas infrastructure upgrades Message-ID: <4E6DBC52.3000202@ripe.net> Dear Atlas users, During the course of this week, we'll be busy with a major upgrade to virtually all components of the Atlas infrastructure. This affects the UI, the backend database, and the probe controllers as well. Please don't be alarmed when your probe disconnects, or if you cannot reach the web interface. We apologize the inconvenience this may cause. Regards, Robert From onoprienko_1988 at mail.ru Wed Sep 21 19:28:02 2011 From: onoprienko_1988 at mail.ru (=?UTF-8?B?QXJ0ZW0gT25vcHJpZW5rbw==?=) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:28:02 +0400 Subject: [atlas] =?utf-8?q?The_letter_from_the_student_Samara_State_Aerosp?= =?utf-8?q?ace_University?= Message-ID: Hello, I?m a student of Samara State Aerospace University. My name is Artem Onoprienko. I study at electronis engineering faculty with specialization in network technologies. I'm going to write a thesis project. I would like to be engaged in monitoring mechanisms of the Internet, and both hardware, and software part. In my work I would like to consider the possibility of additional quality criteria according to the IETF RFC 2544, and the work being done in the Samara State Aerospace University ( http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3710 This work was presented at the conference in Lisbon. In this work, to measure the bandwidth using network testing packages of various sizes) As a first step I would like to see the ability to add these features to the RIPE Test Box. But I found no technical documentation about RIPE?s construction, and it?s electrical components. I would be grateful if you would give a link to documentation about hardware and software construction of the Ripe TestBox. It will be great help for me. With best regards Artem Onoprienko From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Fri Sep 23 11:58:09 2011 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:58:09 +0000 Subject: [atlas] The letter from the student Samara State Aerospace University In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4E7C5831.3060606@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Artem Onoprienko wrote: [...] > But I found no technical documentation about RIPE?s construction, > and it?s electrical components. > I would be grateful if you would give a link to documentation about > hardware and software construction of the Ripe TestBox. I am slightly confused - is this referring to the (traditional) TTM Boxes or the newer Atlas thumb-probes? > It will be great help for me. > With best regards Artem Onoprienko And last but not least, what are the subscribers of this list expected to do with this request? Regards, Wilfried.