Fwd: [atlas]"perceived" downtime of probe?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]time base / synch for the "lst two hours" graphs?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Strikos
astrikos at ripe.net
Wed Mar 30 16:36:13 CEST 2011
Begin forwarded message: > From: Andreas Strikos <astrikos at ripe.net> > Date: March 30, 2011 4:21:09 PM GMT+02:00 > To: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at > Subject: Re: [atlas]"perceived" downtime of probe? > > Hi Wilfried, > > your probe is fine! > Last history uptime values are not propagated immediately to the central database by design. > That is why there were some "fault" calculations for small time for your probe. > Now that the latest uptime values are there, everything seems fine I believe. > > Regards, > Andreas > > On Mar 30, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> could you please have a look at the data for my 414, >> the "uptime" info claims a downtime of 7d, 16h, 51m, >> disconnected at 2011-03-22 20:50:26 UTC, up again at 2011-03-30 13:41:40 UTC. >> >> (the reason for the very short(!) interruption *today* was the need to move >> the USB cable to a different outlet...) [1] >> >> At the same time there is *no* loss of measurement data for this period!? >> >> Has anyone else seen such a situation recently? >> Wilfried >> >> [1] it would really be "cool" to ship future probes with some sort of >> "Y"-cable which w|should allow moving probes without loss of power, >> and/or to connect one plug to a UPS-fed outlet :-) >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20110330/7b2d06d3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas]time base / synch for the "lst two hours" graphs?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]