[atlas] New measurement target suggestion: 6to4 anycast
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] New measurement target suggestion: 6to4 anycast
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Reasons to celebrate - passed 1K active probes :)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Wed Dec 21 13:37:11 CET 2011
On 2011.12.21. 12:21, Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi at niif.hu> wrote: >> Dear All, >> 6to4 should not used any longer. However it would be nice to see how >> 6to4 usage decreasing over the time.... >> > > I agree. It may be interesting to see its eventual sunset, which is > already showing up according to Google's stats: > > http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/ It seems that there is interest for doing this measurement, so we'll add it to the list -- most likely in January, after the holiday break. > Also, quoting Robert Kisteleki: > > " > We are aware that in some cases the lookup has a surprising result. One > example is 6to4: for IPv6 related ASNs the prefix is 2002::/16 but the ASN > can be misleading. We'll most likely stop looking up ASNs for 6to4 (and > Teredo) prefixes. If you see anomalies *not* related to this, you can let us > know at atlas-dev at ripe.net > " > > it is unclear (to me) how much interest and resources should be put > into these measurements. With the current setup we have enough control that setting up a new system-wide measurement is not difficult. However, we have to balance the usefulness of such measurements with the measurement capacity they consume. Regards, Robert
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] New measurement target suggestion: 6to4 anycast
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Reasons to celebrate - passed 1K active probes :)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]