[policy-announce] 2016-04 Review Phase (IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification)

Dear colleagues,

Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 Sub-assignment Clarification" is now in 
the Review Phase.

The goal of this proposal is to re-define the term "sub-assignment" for 
IPv6.

This proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion 
and is now at version v2.0.
Some of the differences from version v1.0 include:
- the scope is extended to all IPv6 assignments
- it defines that the provision of separate IPv6 addresses is not 
considered a sub-assignment

The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal 
version to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full 
proposal and impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04

And the draft documents at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04/draft

As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this 
four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking 
the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft 
RIPE Policy Document.

At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the 
WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide 
your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the 
previous phase.

We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft 
document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 17 
November 2017.

Kind regards,

Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC