From emadaio at ripe.net Mon Mar 4 14:46:03 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:46:03 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-02 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues The draft document for the version 2.0 of the proposal 2012-02, "Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. The only change in the new version is: -modified the first sentence in the second paragraph of section 5.5, "Transfer of Allocation", in the RIPE Policy document ripe-582, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region". You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-02 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-02/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 18 March 2013. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Mon Mar 4 15:26:03 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:26:03 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues The draft document for the version 3.0 of the proposal 2012-03, "Intra-RIR Transfers Policy Proposal", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. The only change in the new version is: -removed a modification to the second paragraph of section 5.5, "Transfer of Allocation", in the RIPE Policy document ripe-592, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 18 March 2013. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Tue Mar 12 16:23:54 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:23:54 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-10 Last Call for Comments (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, The proposal described in 2012-10, "Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis", is now in its Concluding Phase. The Address Policy Working Group co-Chairs have declared that consensus for the proposal has been reached and it will now move to Last Call. As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of these coming four weeks of Last Call is to give the community the opportunity to present well-justified objections in case anyone missed the previous two phases and want to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 9 April 2013 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the co-Chairs of all RIPE Working Groups for consensus. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 9 April 2013. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Tue Mar 19 17:00:56 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:00:56 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2013-03 New Policy Proposal (No Need - Post-Depletion Reality Adjustment and Cleanup) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-582, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now available for discussion. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-03 We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to before 16 April 2013. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From gert at space.net Wed Mar 20 14:20:50 2013 From: gert at space.net (Gert Doering) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:20:50 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20130320132050.GA3174@Space.Net> Dear AP WG, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote: > The draft document for the version 3.0 of the proposal 2012-03, > "Intra-RIR Transfers Policy Proposal", has been published. The impact > analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. [..] > You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 [..] > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 18 March 2013. *No* comments have been received that could be interpreted as "support" or "opposition" to this proposal. (There was one question which was answered, and one statement from the proposer on the reason for a new version). Based on this, the WG chairs have decided to extend the review phase by 4 more weeks. Emilio will send the announcement later today or tomorrow. If the amount of feedback we receive during those next 4 weeks stays at this, we'll then proceed to kill the proposal due to lack of interest from the community. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 From emadaio at ripe.net Wed Mar 20 16:59:31 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:59:31 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-02 Review Period extended until 17 April (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, The Review Period for the proposal 2012-02 has been extended until 17 April. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-02 We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to before 17 April 2013. Regards, Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Wed Mar 20 17:01:46 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:01:46 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-03 Review Period extended until 17 April 2013 (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, The Review Period for the proposal 2012-03 has been extended until 17 April. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to before 17 April 2013. Regards, Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Tue Mar 26 19:19:00 2013 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:19:00 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-07 Draft Document and Impact Analysis will be produced (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, The discussion period for the proposal described in 2012-07, "RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resources Holders", has ended. A draft document and the RIPE NCC Impact Analysis will now be prepared for review. We will publish the documents shortly and we will make an announcement. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-07 Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From niall.oreilly at ucd.ie Wed Mar 27 17:18:59 2013 From: niall.oreilly at ucd.ie (Niall O'Reilly) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:18:59 +0000 Subject: [policy-announce] [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Draft Document and Impact Analysis will be produced (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders) In-Reply-To: <5152E5F5.6080100@CC.UniVie.ac.at> References: <5152E5F5.6080100@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Message-ID: On 27 Mar 2013, at 12:28, Wilfried Woeber wrote: > In this context, may I ask for clarification of intent and/or word-smithing, > by the authors or the NCC, regarding the phrase in 2.6: Although I attempted to clarify the intent in a message archived here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/2013-February/002009.html , you and almost everyone on either of the mailing lists receiving this can't yet have seen how we tried to express this when revising the proposal for v3. Here's what's in my diff-minus-u-style change-tracking copy of the current text of the proposal: 2.6 No relationship ------------------- In cases where the current holder of Legacy Internet Resources cannot be contacted, does not reply to contact from the RIPE NCC or is unknown, there is no formal relationship between the holder and the RIPE NCC. - In such a case, the RIPE NCC will continue to provide those registry - services which are already being provided in respect of the Legacy - Internet Resource or Resources involved, and may update the related - entries in the RIPE Database from time to time to correspond to - current actual situation. + In such a case, the RIPE NCC + - will continue to provide any registry service element already + provided in support of each Legacy Internet Resource involved; + - will have no obligation to begin to provide any registry service + element not already provided in support of a particular Legacy + Internet Resource, even in case the service element is provided in + support of any other Legacy Internet Resource held by the same or + another Resource Holder; + - and may update the related entries in the RIPE Database from time + to time to correspond to the current actual situation. Less formally, this is intended to mean that the NCC should - not curtail service; - not be obliged to implement any missing service element; and - have scope to act to improve the accuracy of the data held. I hope this helps, and encourage you to ask if it doesn't help enough. Best regards, /Niall