From emadaio at ripe.net Fri Jun 1 13:57:44 2012 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:57:44 +0200 Subject: [policy-announce] 2011-05 Proposal Accepted (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, Consensus has been reached, and the proposal for a change to RIPE Document ripe-530, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", has been accepted by the RIPE community. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-05 The updated RIPE Document is ripe-553 and is available at: http://ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-553.html Thank you for your input. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From emadaio at ripe.net Mon Jun 4 14:24:42 2012 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:24:42 +0200 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-553, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now available for discussion. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-05 We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to before 2 July 2012. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From dogwallah at gmail.com Tue Jun 5 15:39:02 2012 From: dogwallah at gmail.com (McTim) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:39:02 -0500 Subject: [policy-announce] [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers) In-Reply-To: <4fcca92e.4d5e0e0a.2ba4.ffffaacaSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> References: <4fcca92e.4d5e0e0a.2ba4.ffffaacaSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Emilio Madaio wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-553, "IPv4 Address Allocation > and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now > available for discussion. Besides publishing a list of v4 resources that have been moved, what does this accomplish that sub-allocations don't already do? Is the recipient LIR charged according to the resources under their registry file? -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."? Jon Postel From mueller at syr.edu Tue Jun 5 16:28:08 2012 From: mueller at syr.edu (Milton L Mueller) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:28:08 +0000 Subject: [policy-announce] [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers) In-Reply-To: References: <4fcca92e.4d5e0e0a.2ba4.ffffaacaSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <855077AC3D7A7147A7570370CA01ECD218277F@SUEX10-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu> > -----Original Message----- > > Besides publishing a list of v4 resources that have been moved, That is the sum and substance of what 2012-05 is intended to do. It does what ARIN and APNIC already do: provide an accessible list of resources that have been moved according to the transfer policies in place. > what does this accomplish that sub-allocations don't already do? > Is the recipient LIR charged according to the resources under their > registry file? Like the previous question that was raised, you seem to be asking questions about the transfer policy itself, not about this proposal. The transfer policy already exists and it is what it is. All this proposal does it let the community know who is using it, and to better assess and track its consequences. --MM From emadaio at ripe.net Fri Jun 8 16:19:55 2012 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:19:55 +0200 Subject: [policy-announce] 2011-06 New Draft Document Published (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, The text of RIPE Policy Proposal, 2011-06, "Abuse Contact management in the RIPE NCC Database", has been revised. We have published the new version (version 3.0) today. Highlights of the changes in version 3.0 are: -Rewording of the RIPE Database in title and in the Abstract; -updated the format of database attribute and objects; -reworded more simply the attribution section. As per RIPE document ripe-500, "Policy Development Process in RIPE", the suggested changes were not considered significant to require a new Discussion Phase. Hence the proposal moves to the Review Phase of the RIPE Policy Development Process. The draft document for the proposal has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net before 6 July. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC From ispyroul at ripe.net Mon Jun 11 10:44:32 2012 From: ispyroul at ripe.net (Ioanna Spyroulia) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:44:32 +0200 Subject: [policy-announce] 2011-04 Implementation: Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation Message-ID: <4FD5AFF0.2020601@ripe.net> [Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC has started the implementation of the accepted RIPE Policy Proposal 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation". We expect that by the end of July we will be ready to: - Extend an IPv6 /32 allocation up to a /29 - Issue an initial IPv6 allocation up to a /29 We will inform you about further details of the implementation closer to the date. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-04 The updated RIPE Document is ripe-552 and is available at: http://ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-552.html If you have any comments or questions, please contact . -- Kind Regards Ioanna Spyroulia RIPE Network Coordination Centre Phone:+31 20 535 4444 Fax:+31 20 535 4445 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From emadaio at ripe.net Thu Jun 21 15:07:36 2012 From: emadaio at ripe.net (Emilio Madaio) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:07:36 +0200 Subject: [policy-announce] 2012-04 Discussion Period extended until 19 July (PI Assignments from the last /8) Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, The text of the policy proposal 2012-04, "PI Assignments from the last /8", has been revised. We have published the new version (version 2.0) today. As a result a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal. Highlights of the changes in version 2.0 are: -added clause 4 to section 5.6.2 You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-04 We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to before 19 July. Regards, Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC