From filiz at ripe.net Tue Feb 6 11:07:01 2007 From: filiz at ripe.net (Filiz Yilmaz) Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:07:01 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2006-06 Last Call for Comments (IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period) Message-ID: <20070206100701.9071A2F583@herring.ripe.net> PDP Number: 2006-06 IPv4 Maximum Allocation Period Dear Colleagues The proposal described in 2006-06 is now at its Concluding Phase. This proposal is to have the RIPE NCC allocate address space to Local Internet Registries (LIRs) based on their one-year needs. In other words, it suggests setting a maximum allocation period of 12 months. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-06.html and the draft RIPE Document at: http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/2006-06-draft.html Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 6 March 2007. Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer From filiz at ripe.net Thu Feb 8 17:15:14 2007 From: filiz at ripe.net (Filiz Yilmaz) Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:15:14 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2006-04 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Contact e-mail Address Requirements) Message-ID: <20070208161514.CBEC02F583@herring.ripe.net> PDP Number: 2006-04 Contact e-mail Address Requirements Dear Colleagues The proposal 2006-04, Contact e-mail Address Requirements has been withdrawn. The proposer and the Address Policy Working Group chair decided that not enough consensus was reached. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/archive/ Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer From filiz at ripe.net Wed Feb 14 17:33:52 2007 From: filiz at ripe.net (Filiz Yilmaz) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:33:52 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size) Message-ID: <20070214163352.AF8552F583@herring.ripe.net> PDP Number: 2006-05 PI Assignment Size Dear Colleagues We have published a draft document for the proposal described in 2006-05. This proposal suggests to have the minimum assignment size for PI assignments to be a /24 when routing is a major issue for a multihoming End User. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05.html and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/2006-05-draft.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 14 March 2007. Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer From filiz at ripe.net Mon Feb 26 07:02:32 2007 From: filiz at ripe.net (Filiz Yilmaz) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:02:32 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2006-02 Discussion Period extended until 19 March 2007 (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy) Message-ID: <20070226060232.795982F583@herring.ripe.net> PDP Number: 2006-02 IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy Dear Colleagues The Discussion Period for the proposal 2006-06 has been extended until until 19 March 2007. This proposal is to change the IPv6 Initial Allocation criteria and the End Site definition in the "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy". You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to . Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer From filiz at ripe.net Tue Feb 27 10:55:41 2007 From: filiz at ripe.net (Filiz Yilmaz) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:55:41 +0100 Subject: [policy-announce] 2006-07 Last Call for Comments (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size) Message-ID: <20070227095541.726292F583@herring.ripe.net> PDP Number: 2006-07 First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size Dear Colleagues The proposal described in 2006-07 is now at its Concluding Phase. This proposal suggests the Assignment Window (AW) available to new LIRs should automatically be raised from zero (0) to /21 (2,048 IPv4 addresses) six months after they receive their first allocation. Because the sub-allocation policy references the AW policy, the sub-allocation policy also needs to be updated. This proposal suggests that the maximum sub-allocation should be kept at /20 (4,096 IPv4 addresses). You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-07.html Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 27 March 2007. Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer