[ncc-services-wg] ncc-services-wg Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20

The action those government people asked for touches *ALL* Ukrainian 
companies, and made a lot of harm to them.

There should be a very strong reason to take this action for all 
regions, not only those in distress. We do not see it now.

The NCC staff in case of the transfer pushes companies in distress 
regions either to move a legal address to the unoccupied territories, OR 
to change the registration of the company to a Russian laws. This case 
no restrictions for the transfers applied. So the transfers ban for 
Ukrainian companies does not protect the resource holders against the 
forced transfer on the occupied territories. As I know, there is NO BAN 
FOR THE TRANSFERS ON OCCUPIED TERRITORIES FOR THE RUSSIAN-BASED 
[ex-Ukrainian] COMPANIES.

So we do not believe in the official reason of this ban, and do not 
believe in the existence of any of this forced transfers. "Just believe 
me" from one of the most corrupted government in the world officials and 
associated persons looks funny.

Actions of NCC board against the community (absence of) consensus by 
that doubtful way with these doubtful actions, without clear 
explanations of what's happened - looks awful and danger for the future 
cooperation between RIPE and RIPE NCC. That's why NCC board should 
resign voluntarily now.

21.12.22 23:32, Serg Galat пише:
>>> Stop transfer from UA to RU LIRs? Ok, but such transfers usual not to RU LIRs.
>> Do you have an example, how it happened before? Or is it just concerns
>> that it might happen theoretically?
> 
> No one who did ones will will give you proof! Why? Because their relatives and friends are still under occupation. Is this clear?
> Theoretically? May be, but not for me.