[ncc-services-wg] Proposal: optimized rev-DNS operations

Kurt Kayser wrote on 25/10/2019 13:39:
> Since the IPv6-blocks are quite large, one member might be interested
> towards areas that have active reverse requests coming in (but those are
> only visible up to the RIPE NCC servers, if they are not delegated for
> *all* IPv6 address space, which I doubt will ever happen.
> 
> If they would have a means to know those top-areas they could
> (optionally) start analyzing and a delegation process and deliver
> answers for such addresses.

but is it really the RIPE NCC's business to chase this down for resource 
holders?  If the resource holder wants to know, they can get the dns 
delegated and investigate this themselves.  If they don't want to know, 
that's kinda their business.

Nick