[ncc-services-wg] Issue with membership/registering resources with a german GmbH & Co. KG
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Issue with membership/registering resources with a german GmbH & Co. KG
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Issue with membership/registering resources with a german GmbH & Co. KG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey Race
jrace at attglobal.net
Tue Aug 6 21:22:14 CEST 2019
The statement is contradicted by American law and by my personal experience. The d/ba/ alias is a legal convenience in dealing with the public. It connects to a person who is (unless barred by law due e.g. to insanity) legally competent to contract. I sign contracts all the time on behalf of my d/b/a Cambridge Electronics Laboratories <www.camblab.com> Jeffrey Race On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 11:47:50 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >In message <EE2F0323-5B68-4734-B5CE-0EA6CD47C88D at velea.eu>, >Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote: >>we have had a similar issue with customers from USA. Fictious names or d/b/as >>are not recognized by the RIPE NCC (although these are accepted by the rest >>of the world)... >In the United States fictitious business names are just what the name implies, >i.e. the are (legal) fictions. They are simply legally sanctioned pseudonyms >for some *actual* person or corporate entity. They CANNOT enter into >legally binding contracts. >I am therefore not surprised that the NCC would not allow any such things to >-pretend- that they could in fact enter into legally binding contracts. >And I, for one, would be greatly disappointed if the NCC went around >entering into contracts that are neither valid nor legally enforcable. >Regards, >rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Issue with membership/registering resources with a german GmbH & Co. KG
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Issue with membership/registering resources with a german GmbH & Co. KG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]