[ncc-services-wg] Should we have a RIPE archivist?
Gert Doering gert at space.net
Sat Apr 28 13:41:50 CEST 2018
Hi, On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 01:20:07PM +0200, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > I sympathize with this point of view. Saying that NCC should pay for > something or hire someone to do something while we do have recurring > discussion about member fees is imho at least careless. I totally disagree with this view. Someone will always complain that the fees are too high (and I might even agree with them, like, for a non-for-profit, the RIPE NCC member fees *are* high) - but using that as an argument to stop any sort of investment does not lead anywhere useful. Of course we shouldn't be wasting money carelessly - but spending money to improve what the NCC is there for (being a secretariat for the members' benefit) is not automatically "wasting money". Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20180428/d900b177/attachment.sig>