[ncc-services-wg] NCC's reserves
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC's reserves
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC's reserves
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Sat Apr 26 13:23:14 CEST 2014
On 26/04/14 09:12, Måns Nilsson wrote: > Subject: Re: [ncc-services-wg] NCC's reserves Date: Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:07:34PM +0100 Quoting Jim Reid (jim at rfc1035.com): >> On 25 Apr 2014, at 10:23, Lindqvist Kurt Erik <kurtis at kurtis.pp.se> wrote: >> >>> We are currently in the odd situation that as we are seeing resources depleted, we are seeing the RIPE NCC growing larger than ever. >> Indeed. It's decidedly odd. There must be some sort of alternate Parkinson's law which explains why the NCC's head count and budget increases as the number resources it manages get depleted. >> >> However the NCC is not just what Daniel calls "a number factory". There are all these other services as well -- too many IMO -- and I think this WG might have some responsibility in that area. :-) > > The need of managing the decreasing pool might involve an increased > work effort per address block transferred between entities. Whenever > I find that I'm up against organisational challenges from the NCC I go > and read the first meeting minutes from something that could seem to be > a completely different organisation: > > As a working title for the activities the meeting adopted the name RIPE > (Reseaux IP Europeen). > > ... > > 7 Network Registration > All participants agree that there should be some sort of registration of > the networks taking part in the European IP net. This way any problems > that may occur can be signaled to the responsible person. It was stressed > that this registration activity is just a matter of keeping the registry > up to date: in no way it should constitute some sort of authority. A > 'whois' style of information service was suggested as a useful tool to > access registry information. (Action: Anders Hillbo) > > Also a list of gateways should be created, describing which networks > are authorised to use particular gateways. > > No formal policy statements were made and there should be no thresholds > for organisations who wish to connect to the net, except for a description > of the network and information about contact addresses to be entered > into the registry. The need was recognised to write a document describing > the ethics and acceptable use of the European IP network. (Action: all) > > What happened? The world changed Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC's reserves
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] NCC's reserves
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]