[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hph at oslo.net
Wed Apr 23 11:51:22 CEST 2014
On 22/04/2014 23:31, Sander Steffann wrote: > - for a reasonable price (is €500 reasonable? compared to the €50 of option 2.3) Could be from a "strategic pricing point of view) - but the cost may be higher. > The membership fee per year for LIRs*might* be a little bit higher, but because membership fees have been going down steadily over the last couple of years and the number of members is currently around 10k I would be really surprised if this will be very noticeable for any LIR's fee. If we currently have 10 000 members at 1600 EUR (proposed 2015) that gives a revenue of¨16M 1000 legacy holders at 500E would give anoither 0,5M totaling 16,5M If the fees were distributed evenly it would be 1500 pr member I do not have a particulary strong feeling about the fees. My company can easily afford the 1600 over the 1500. But several new LIR who only get the /22 have expressed that they think this fee is unfairly high so they would also like to pay only 500. Personally I can live with both - but I would like to see the fee strucure easily beeing explainable. Hans Petter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20140423/cfe59745/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]