[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:13:32AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > ... because the policy says so, as in "the community decided that they
> > want the NCC to offer this"
> 
> But from Randy and Sander's messages to this thread it seems fairly
> clear that the DAU option the membership is asked to approve at the GM
> is *NOT* what the community (or at least not the 2012-07 authors) wanted
> the NCC to offer.
> 
> So, what do I do at the GM?
[..]
> There appears to be no way possible combination of votes that I can cast
> at GM that would establish a *useful* DAU option in line with how the
> community and 2012-07 authors wanted it (i.e., one where "reasonable
> charges" means "significantly cheaper than full LIR status"). I find
> that quite problematic!

Yeah.  They are doing it again.  I think we'll see quite a bit of
heated discussion in ncc-services - but I have no idea what to vote
for, except maybe for "do not discharge the board".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20140422/c1b27a1e/attachment.sig>