[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Apr 21 14:11:13 CEST 2014
* Sander Steffann > As long as the argument is 'can we get rid of this because nobody > needs it', Precisely. I don't currently understand who would possibly need or want this option, given that the other options available seems better in every possible way. But then again, I might be missing something - which is why I brought it up. If a good reason for keeping the option does exist, then I would like to educate myself about it, so that I can make an informed decision when casting my vote (or possibly abstaining) at the GM. > and not 'can we get rid of this because the NCC doesn't/won't > implement it (in a usable form) anyway' then I don't mind :) As far as I can tell, the NCC's proposal will, if approved, faithfully implement 2012-07's "DAU" option. Whether or not that option is useful to anyone is a different question entirely - the answer to that question is what I'm looking for here. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]