[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)

* Sascha Luck
> I'm afraid that every objection made to 2008-08 (which proposal failed
> to achieve consensus) applies exactly the same to this proposal. Rather
> than re-iterating every argument here again, I refer to the
> original thread re. 2008-08:
> 
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2011-May/005737.html

If I read it correctly, the linked to argument is against RPKI as a
whole. However, 2013-04 isn't a question on whether we should do RPKI or
not, but whether or not our *existing* RPKI stuff should be extended to
include non-members.

I think it should. If we're doing something to begin with, we shouldn't
be doing it half-arsed. So I support the policy.

I've got one question though. What is the rationale for the requirement
that «the Internet resources reside within the RIPE NCC service region»?
I don't see the reason for this. IMHO, any PI/legacy space
issued/maintained by the RIPE NCC should be eligible for certification
under this policy, no matter where on (or off!) the planet it's being used.

Tore