[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sun May 12 10:25:49 CEST 2013
Hi Sasha, > This would appear to empower the NCC to unilaterally, de-register or > even re-register such resources. (which is, IIRC, what the NCC > originally proposed and what triggered this proposal) > Maybe we should limit this to changing the relevant objects to "Unknown" > or similar... I think that is too limiting. We should limit the NCC to putting in accurate information. Deregistration would then only be possible if the NCC *knows* nobody is using that resource anymore, and I see no problem with that. (the problem will be finding proof, not the deregistration itself) Cheers, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]