[ncc-services-wg] Certifying of PI End User Address Space

Andrew,

> impact, as they align with our current business practices. Option 3 would
> require PI End Users to have a direct contact with the RIPE NCC. As this
> would be a new venture for the RIPE NCC, we expect it would be the most
> labour intensive of the three options and would have the greatest impact
> in terms of resources.

could you please clarify whether options (1) and (3) would differ in resource
consumption and why?
Option (3) makes no indication regarding cost recovery. Setting the legacy
resource holder debate aside, is the expectation that option (3) would provide
the service free of charge, billed on hours incurred or by a fixed fee?
Given that the current charging model is flat, but does not have to remain
flat in the future, is a subscription model feasible?  (a subscriber is
basically a paying customer receiving the same services as a member,
whithout having the rights and duties of a member)).

-Peter, as an individual