[ncc-services-wg] git is the answer: now what was the question?
Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Mar 15 23:13:07 CET 2013
On 15 Mar 2013, at 21:55, Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com> wrote: >> You also appear to be defining outcomes before the requirements are agreed. Or even clear. Let's first understand what problem needs solved and then decide what's the best way to solve them. > > That's what we are doing. To arrive at that, we need something to base > our discussion on. If I hadn't proposed the above, we would not be > having this conversation. Your emails on this topic are NOT doing that at all. They're doing the very opposite. You've already decided that git is the solution to everything. As yet it's not clear what problem needs fixing. [Or if there's a consensus that this problem does indeed need fixing.] I suggest you focus on that.