[ncc-services-wg] Pre-PDP discussion: "Yearly list of services by RIPE"

Dear Richard,
a good idea, but wrong proposal format.
Let's ask the Board to do such reports.


--
Sergey

Friday, March 15, 2013, 8:13:51 PM, you wrote:

RH> Dear all,

RH> this is the fifth suggestion:


RH>   RIPE will create a yearly list of all services it provides to
RH> members or the general public

RH>   This list will include at least:
RH>   * Name of the service
RH>   * Cost in time and money of maintaining and possibly extending this service
RH>   * Cost in time and money of maintaining the backend needed for this
RH> service; this is to catch stuff that relies on old and brittle infra
RH>   * Number of users if applicable/traceable per year
RH>   * Number of queries/transactions if applicable/traceable per year
RH>   * General usefulness of the service from RIPE's POV
RH>   * Status of service, such as "active, supported", "deprecated", or
RH> "scheduled for decommissioning on YYYY-MM-DD"
RH>   * A suggestion for the future status of the service

RH>   If in doubt, RIPE will focus less on detailed interpretation and
RH> analysis and more on giving out as many hard facts and stats as
RH> possible. Interpretation will happen on the mailing lists anyway.
RH>   RIPE will implement this policy in a light-weight manner that is not
RH> a drain on resources in and as of itself.