[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Wed Feb 27 15:29:08 CET 2013
On 27/02/2013 14:27, Wilfried Woeber wrote: > But the question regarding "legal due diligence" may be asked the other way > 'round, too: we've got a holder and user of a resource, and someone (an RIR) > questions the rightfulness (is this an engl. word?), then wouldn't it be > "fair" for that party to come up with the "documentation", from a legal pov? I don't know the answer to these questions. Probably the RIPE NCC will need to get a legal opinion on this, which might happen in the review stage of the PDP. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]