[ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Sun Feb 17 17:23:50 CET 2013
Sascha, On 15/02/2013 22:38, Sascha Luck wrote: > > How would you feel if the cops published lists like: > > -Sander Stefann > > That sort of stuff sticks and never goes away even if it is subsequently > found to be bullshit. You are making your point quite clearly, there is no need to make comparisons like that, especially, as we all know, things have a way of being taken out of context and hanging around the Internet forever. > > Also, the identity of the submitter MUST be published even in this case. > No anonymity for snitches, the Stasi wasn't *that* long ago Equally, let's not make leaps like this either. Make your objections in a sensible, logical way, which I'm sure you're capable of doing, please. Brian Co-Chair, AA-WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 New Policy Proposal (Openness about Policy Violations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]