[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Wed Feb 6 06:55:13 CET 2013
At 01:31 06/02/2013 +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote: >Removal of registration as a long term prospect: this will be necessary. >There is undoubtedly a pile of ERX address space which is either squatted >or abandoned. As a long term objective, I think that there is some duty of >stewardship that makes de-registration of data a requirement. Maybe we >don't need to deal with it in 2012-07, but it is inevitable on a 20-50 year >basis. I agree. If the inetnum or autnum is unused and not routed for the past 5 years, and all attempts at contact via email to the data listed in whois, then by all means, initiate some sort of squatting/abandoned project. But this has nothing to do with LRH, but should be a RIR policy. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]