[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Feb 6 02:00:03 CET 2013
> We're all agreed that any talk of renting integers is silly now that the > standard charging mechanism put an end to that (which makes lots of things > much simpler actually). A services fee is appropriate, imo, but I believe > that this would be better handled via a sponsoring LIR for the same reasons > that apply to 2007-01. see my other message on sponsoring lirs o not appropriate for a large number of non-r&r lrhs. tell it to the brit gov with their /8, or many industrials with /16s, etc o it just increases the same non-contact problem we have with PI > When 2007-01 became policy, the RIPE NCC originally provided a mechanism > for a direct relationship and I'll be brutally honest in saying that I was > horrified when they jacked that price up to the same as the membership > fee let's be sure not to let that one happen again > there aren't big roadblocks to PI end users getting LIR sponsorship > contracts in place but we do not know the real identity of those hiding behind lirs. would you want to certify them? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]