[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Mon Feb 4 11:51:25 CET 2013
On 04/02/2013 09:02, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Which we will. We are trying to create a policy/framework to regulate NCC > services in regards to LRH - which does not exist today. > > The question everyone needs to answer is "is what has so far been sent > better than no policy?" Do you support the general direction we are going > in, ignoring the nits which can easily be fixed? The general direction is great and I think this update to the proposal is a huge improvement on v1.0, but do not support the policy proposal as it stands because it still has critical problems. The most important of these problems is a discussion / decision about what to do with registration services for legacy resource holders / legacy resources who do not engage with the RIPE NCC. There are other serious problems with the proposal too, and a couple of nits which are easily fixable. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]