[ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC PGP Key
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Mon Dec 23 13:07:20 CET 2013
On 23/12/2013 11:29, Bijal Sanghani wrote: > We've asked the RIPE NCC for some clarity on your comments regarding > section 3.0 in the policy proposal, please see Athina's reply below: [...] > “This definition gives a non-exclusive list of services. Other services, > both current and future, may also be considered Registration Services. > This proposal does not specify the process according to which a service > (other than those listed) is identified as Registration Services. > Therefore, the RIPE NCC will make this decision after consultation with > the membership and RIPE Community.” [...] > Therefore we believe that an addition of a term that includes > automatically new services to the contract with legacy holders would > contradict the other term of the proposal (about the specification of > the services in respect of each resource identified). ok, i see the reasoning behind this and withdraw my concerns about sections 3.0 and 2.4. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] comments on proposal 2012-07
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] New RIPE NCC PGP Key
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]