[ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Wed Dec 4 14:54:09 CET 2013
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:57:26PM +0100, Alex Band wrote: > Most importantly, the functionality does not actually offer any additional security. could you please elaborate on this assessment? > This is something that is provided by true two-factor authentication. Sure, _true_ two-factor authentication. I'd assume that since it's only .7%, the X.509 users (of which I am not one) are or have already been targetted directly? -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Authentication Proposal for RIPE NCC Access
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]