[ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Sep 19 17:49:00 CEST 2012
Michael Markstaller wrote: [...] > Anyone who thinks it's useful to talk about (long-term!) Root-CA > services by (RIR)/RIPE? Caveat: very personal and non-PC point of view! I consider the whole concept of tree-structured CAs an architectural failure. With that in mind, I do not want to see the NCC drawn into that swamp. It just increases the NCC's attack surface. The NCC will be forced to deal with quite a big number of these fundamental issues eventually, within the context of RPKI, though... > Instead of commercial instances that just print money and sell them in > case without anything (just price) to dictators like *.google.com Any attempt to manage trust as a commodity and to sell it in a competitive market, where the majority of customers and consumers (with a broad definition of both) do not understand the technology and the risks - is doomed to fail. Unfortunately, I do not have a workable, scalable alternative solution to propose :-( Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]