This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Policy Proposal (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Policy Proposal (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Policy Proposal (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Sep 12 14:03:42 CEST 2012
Hi Sasha, > I'd support the proposal but for a disagreement with the wording in (ia) s5.5: > > "In the case that the holder of a legacy Internet resource opts to engage via a sponsoring LIR and wishes to avail only of basic services > as defined above, assessment of the billing category of the sponsoring > LIR should take account of the legacy resource using a score or rate > less than that applicable for a corresponding PI resource" > > I've always taken the position that resources that are not controlled, > merely sponsored, by a LIR should not count into the billing category > calculations for that LIR, and thus cannot agree with any proposal that > can be construed to cement this practice for the forseeable future. I agree that text related to billing categories should be left out of the next version of the proposal. Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Policy Proposal (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Policy Proposal (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]