[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Oct 18 00:10:27 CEST 2012
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote: >Thats clear but there IMHO must be some path to get hold of the user - >either via sponsoring LIR or via upstream (which might be more >complicated but also a way..) I'm not actually concerned about your use-case of an uncontactable PI end-user, that is entirely legit. What worries me more is every internet muppet and their brother now being able to harass and threaten a LIR for any perceived wrong by a sponsored end-user (when the LIR could actually not even do anything about it). >>> Just a suggestion: If its only about privacy, a tradeoff could >>> be: only visible for LIRs in lirportal (?) This would at least mitigate against kooks and randomers. Most LIRs should know about the PI-sponsoring relationship. rgds, Sascha
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]