[ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bengt Gördén
bengan at bag.org
Tue Oct 16 12:51:24 CEST 2012
2012-10-16 12:14, Nick Hilliard skrev: > Hi Bengt > > On 16/10/2012 09:44, Bengt Gördén wrote: >> First. I'm in favor of this proposal if the sponsoring LIR is clearly >> stated in the resource. Would it be to much to ask if the record in the db >> would reflect the relationship between sponsering LIR and the object >> maintainer? It could be as lightweight as "databasehelper-mnt" or something >> more suitable. > Kaveh Ranjbar presented some ideas at the last RIPE meeting which may be > relevant to this: > > https://ripe65.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/db-wg/ Thank you. That saved me some time digging through the "have not seen" sessions. I was at the EIX session at that time. > >> that the sky will not fall down. At least not in Sweden. We get about 0.8% >> "DMCA take down requests" or similar in proportion to the number of >> assignment resources in the RIPE database that we have. We just have to >> politely respond to them and explain the situation. I think the average >> "take down" requester does not know how things work for the RIR/LIR. I can >> see a problem in a country where the law is in favor of "take down" >> requester. At least in Sweden, we see this much like National Land Survey. >> They have the responsibility for registering property, but not the >> operational responsibility for what happens there. If this is a problem for >> the RIPE region at large, I think we have to consider the proposal again. > To be honest I really don't see how this is substantially different to open > registration for any other details. The principals of open registration > are very well established and we all agree that it is a good thing. Agreed. I'm a firm believer in openness and transparency. This was just a reservation that if the proposal don't get approved I think we need to have another discussion about it. Sorry if that wasn't clear. I need to know the sponsoring LIR for my daily work. /bengt
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]