[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Aug 29 14:09:03 CEST 2012
Hi Nigel, On 29.08.2012 13:59, Nigel Titley wrote: >> maybe it should be looked at the other way round: that legacy space >> holders as good netizens want to unilaterally move this address space >> under a policy, given that the policy serves their needs and views? > Well, actually the proposal explicitly precludes moving the address > space under normal address policy. It explicitly says that "...[such > future revisions] must never restrict the rights of Legacy Resource > Holders to their legacy resources." that is why I wrote "under _A_ policy" - that doesn't necessarily mean normal address policy. :-) Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]