[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] policy proposals for ERX holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friacas
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Aug 29 12:22:14 CEST 2012
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 29/08/2012 10:18, Jim Reid wrote: >> On 29 Aug 2012, at 10:05, Gert Doering wrote: >> >>> ERX space has not been given out under RIPE policies, so they do not >>> apply. Period. There is no law, legal contract, or anything else that >>> would make RIPE policies automagically apply to ERX space >> >> +1000. >> >> It's a great pity the recent policy proposal doesn't use those very words. >> >> > This actually raises an interesting issue. Are there any circumstances in > which RIPE policy would apply to legacy space? > Could, for example, the AP-WG > unilaterally propose a policy that annexed legacy space? Hello, I don't think so. Don't you think some court actions would immediately follow...? > I've heard this > suggested several times. And of course, if RIPE policy doesn't apply to > legacy space, why are the legacy holders raising a proposal at all? "services to" seems to be the key part... :-) Regards, Carlos Friaças > Nigel >
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] policy proposals for ERX holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]