[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Aug 29 12:21:00 CEST 2012
On 29/08/2012 11:14, Randy Bush wrote: >> if RIPE policy doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy >> holders raising a proposal at all? > because the founding fathers and mothers, who have been quietly minding > their own business for a couple of decades received nasty letters from > the ncc? The person at the NCC who sent those letters has had a sharp kick up the posterior. > > because the founding partents actually are trying to be part of the > family of their children and grandchildren? Indeed... but I was asking a more fundamental question. If the PDP has no jurisdiction over the legacy holders then why are the legacy holders invoking a process which they are avowing has no jurisdiction over them? Please understand this is a somewhat mischievious question, but one that I feel needs to be answered. Nigel > > randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]