[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lindqvist Kurt Erik
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Aug 24 12:32:59 CEST 2012
On 23 aug 2012, at 19:16, Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > On 23 Aug 2012, at 17:50, Nigel Titley wrote: > >> I'm assuming that Niall et al will refactor the proposal and > > Soon. > If anyone would like to add their early comments to those from Tore and Daniel, > they will be welcome off-list or on, and we'll take them into account. > > Thanks to Tore and Daniel for theirs. I have a proposed clarity I like to see added. The document very briefly talks about how and under what conditions these legacy blocks where allocated. I think the document would benefit with clarifying this a bit further. I.e what's the relationship to the IANA registry, to the IR registry, RFC1174 and RFC1466. What happens if the IETF updates the IPv4 registry with a new RFC etc etc. Best regards, - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]